For example in Africa, hunger, starvation, poverty, malnutrition have been renamed”AIDS” to gain a political construct for toxic Antiretroviral drugs. The pre AIDS era diseases called “Opportunistic Infections” have been renamed AIDS along with someone having common diseases such as Malaria and Tuberculosis have also been renamed “AIDS”. In the United stated the ELISA antibody test and the confirmitory Western blot antibody test [together] are considered an “AIDS” test, however in the United States the Bangui definition for “AIDS” is not recognized so even if the diagnosis of HIV-1 antibodies have been confirmed and the Tcell count in the person is 201 they don’t have “AIDS” by the CDC’s T-cell definition criteria.

Surprisingly there is no such thing as an “HIV” test. The majority of the people in the public do not even know that “HIV” testing is not a test for virus but for an antibody response in the person testing if “HIV” is present in their blood.

Theoretically having antibodies wake up in a persons blood such as a flu vaccine is “good news” however this is not taught with “HIV” antibodies. All of the antibody tests that have only been FDA approved for prognostic purposes, point of care settings or TO AID in a diagnosis are also known to cross react with the antigens in the test kits by 70-100 conditions.

These common promiscuous antibody/antigen cross reactions are not revealed by doctors,nurses, phlebotomists, and other campaign testing centers.

Got Tuberculosis? Are you or were ever you pregnant? did you just recently get vaccinated for Flu? Do you have a cold sore(herpes)? have you had anal sex?do you have the flu? you could very well have a false positive result on the ever popular “HIV” antibody test

Antibody testing for “HIV”-1 and “HIV”2 have never been verified as a diagnostic test, a common manufacturer of the ELISA antibody test kit Abbot laboratories have revealed that no “HIV” test has a universal gold standard with this legal disclaimer:

“At Present (2010) there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of “HIV”1 antibody or “HIV”2 antibody in human blood”

so if there is[ no recognized standard] for HIV [antibodies] in human blood then it’s not a test for “HIV” in human blood.

a more common antibody test that has been highly publicized is the PCR or Viral Load which should basically do away with all of the other antibody tests because experts claim that the PCR test can detect how much virus is in a person’s blood.

the popular legal disclaimer for these viral load tests actually goes a step further by saying:

“This Test is not to be used as a screening test or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV”

The more we hear about innocent people taking these unreliable tests, we have to feel a persons pain and emotions, being told you have a deadly virus and then given a prognosis of death by an acronym of four letters is purely criminal and evil. There is no such thing as an HIV/AIDS test.